Autographed Letter Signed

A Mostly Center-Right Place For Those With Irritable Obama Syndrome and Diversity Fatigue

David Letterman and the Culture of Liberal Entitlement by Jenn Q. Public June 16, 2009

Palin 34

By Jenn Q. Public

Cross-posted at http://www.jennqpublic.com/

David Letterman feels entitled.

He’s entitled to use spew crude, sexually degrading invective to portray a teenage girl as a sexual object.

Maybe you saw it on one of the highlight reels, one awkward moment for Sarah Palin at the Yankee game. During the seventh inning, her daughter was knocked up by Alex Rodriguez.

The hardest part of her visit [to New York] was keeping Eliot Spitzer away from her daughter

He’s entitled to use a class and gender based slur to demean the most popular sitting governor in the United States.

[Sarah Palin] bought makeup from Bloomingdale’s to update her “slutty flight attendant” look

And he’s entitled to smugly repeat his rank insults while delivering a non-apology to Sarah Palin in painstakingly choreographed deadpan, milking each sexist remark one more time to the delight of a fawning audience.

palinWhat gives Dave Letterman license to repeatedly troll the gutter without ever dirtying his Worldwide Pants?

Liberalism.

Didn’t you realize?  He can’t be sexist, he’s a liberal.  He’s no misogynist – he votes Democrat.  Like all liberals, Dave will tell you he loves women.  He respects them.  Isn’t he pro-choice?  Isn’t he sufficiently appalled by breast cancer? Doesn’t he joke all the time about those brutish southerners who beat their wives with Confederate flags? Haven’t you heard?  He’s a card carrying liberal. Liberal, I tell you.  Liberal!

Among his liberal buddies, Letterman can get away with pretending that he intended to insult Sarah Palin’s 18-year-old daughter Bristol, not her younger child Willow.  But Willow was at the ballgame, Bristol was thousands of miles away, and Letterman is the skeevy guy in dress shoes and a tan trench coat who bares it all to a 14-year-old girl on the subway, then swears to the cops, “But I thought she was 18,” as he’s being hauled off to jail.

“Look at my record,” Dave told his audience as he clarified his remarks about Willow.  What he means is he’s on record as being liberal.  He knows the secret handshake and everything!  And as we all know, liberal men are inherently sensitive to sexism in our society.

You see, liberal identity is a bubble that protects those inside from accusations of sexism, racism, and other forms of bigotry. It’s considered a nearly unassailable defense against the indefensible.  It’s a free pass, a blind eye, and a Get Out of Jail Free card all rolled into one.

Racially and sexually charged jabs are still acceptable in liberal circles because it’s mutually acknowledged that they know better.  It’s not like they’re conservatives – you know, the real sexists – so they can say and do as they please without inviting the same consequences a conservative would incur.

And if the target is a conservative woman, well, even better because there’s no chance those pesky feminists will get their panties in a collective bunch.  Melissa Clouthier explains why:

Women on the Right, are not considered women. Period. They are considered gender traitors. There simply can be no honest disagreement. This is thought policing and fascistic thinking at it’s worst.

David Letterman is also no stranger to bigoted, elitist one-liners about the Palin family’s middle class roots, and by extension, all people of average means.  In addition to the “slutty flight attendant” slur, Michelle Malkin dug up the following examples of Letterman’s oh so enlightened commentary about Sarah Palin:

“You know, she reminds me, she looks like the flight attendant who won’t give you a second can of Pepsi. No, you’ve had enough. We’re landing. Looks like the waitress at the coffee shop who draws a little smiley face on your check. Have a nice day.”

Tasteless Anti-Palin ad from the left.

Tasteless Anti-Palin ad from the left.

“She looks like the dip sample lady at Safeway. She looks like the nurse who weighs you and then makes you sit alone in your underwear for 20 minutes. She looks like the Olive Garden hostess who says, ‘I’m sorry, your table isn’t ready yet.” She looks like infomercial lady who says she made $64,000 a month flipping condos.”“[S]he looks like the lady at the bakery who yells out ‘44! 45!’ She looks like a real estate agent whose picture you see on the bus stop bench. That’s who she looks like. She looks like the lady who has a chain of cupcake stores…”

Feminist1But don’t forget, liberalism absolves Dave from responsibility for the classism he perpetuates when he derides Sarah Palin by comparing her to working class people.  Everyone knows liberals are sensitive and open-minded, and that entitles him to say what he wants without ever expecting to be raked over the coals.

As many writers have observed, the feminist silence on Letterman’s sexually inappropriate remarks about Sarah and Willow Palin is predictably deafening.  The unwritten rule is that feminism stands for liberal women – authentic women – not conservative women who are, by virtue of their conservatism, anti-woman.

The National Organization for Women (NOW) and Ms. Magazine both declined to send representatives to be interviewed for an On The Record segment about Letterman’s sexually derogatory treatment of the governor and her daughter.  Instead, NOW opted to release a statement as critical of conservatives as it was of Dave Letterman.

NOW hopes that all the conservatives who are fired up about sexism in the media lately will join us in calling out sexism when it is directed at women who aren’t professed conservatives.”

NOW also managed to miss the real thrust of Letterman’s remarks about Sarah Palin:

Letterman also joked about what he called Palin’s “slutty flight attendant look” — yet another example of how the media love to focus on a woman politician’s appearance, especially as it relates to her sexual appeal to men.

Yes, the media focus on Sarah Palin’s appearance often delves into sexist territory.  But what about the use of the word “slutty,” NOW?  Slutty doesn’t speak to “her sexual appeal to men.” It reinforces the belief that by being attractive and fertile, Sarah Palin invites attacks on her virtue as a woman.  It says, you can’t be a beautiful woman, a good wife, a loving mother, and a career politician.  Pick one.

The response that NOW should have given was instead delivered by a fledgling feminist organization called The New Agenda.

“Letterman’s apology talk last night was cheap,” said The New Agenda co-founder and President Amy Siskind. “True contrition would not invite the Palin’s on his show after publicly humiliating them and their 14-year old daughter. If Letterman’s apology is authentic, he should show it by devoting part of his show to address the national crisis of the sexualization of our teenage daughters.”

The New Agenda was also happy to publish my recent piece on Playboy’s conservative rape fantasy article.

Feminists, that is how it’s done.

Amy Siskind, founder of The New Agenda, took her message to The Huffington Post yesterday in a piece called, “Sexism Against Conservative Women Is Still Sexism.”  Think it would be hard to argue with that simple concept?  You’d be wrong.  Here’s a tiny selection of what the HuffPo commenters had to say about Sarah Palin and sexism:

propitiousmoment: ” She wants to use her sexuality to advance her agenda … might I say, the classic definition of a bimbo.”

andyboy: “To defend a woman from a sexist attack simply because she is a woman is actually the essence of sexism.”

voltaireinexile: “She played the pretty-sexy-mama card all along, undermining what many women have fought so hard against –the objectification of women”

arnray: “Palin and the rest use their sexuality to numb the senses of the dullards and then cry foul when someone throws it back at them.”

Gainsbourg69: “When a woman wants to be considered more than just a sex object she should take steps necessary to avoid being labeled a sex object. Simple.”

Wilson201: “Palin marginalizes her own opinions by dressing the way she does just as Prejeans opinion is by posing barely clothed. If they wish to be taken seriously, then they should dress and behave properly.

Sarah-Palin-Cartoon-5Amy’s piece also attracted a host of comments insisting there’s nothing sexist about calling Palin a “slutty flight attendant” if the shoe fits.  Right.  Palin was practically begging for Dave’s insults just like Michelle Malkin invited the Playboy rape fantasy.  Is it any wonder where conservative writers like Kathleen Parker, trying to curry favor with the media elite, pick up ideas like this:

I also think it’s out of line for a woman to sexualize her candidacy, which Palin did. Just ask Rich Lowry, who wrote that he had to sit up a little straighter when she winked during the vp debate. So, maybe when you play the flirt and invite males to see starbursts bouncing off the walls (Lowry again), then maybe you invite the sexual punchline.

It’s clear that sexually demeaning the women with whom we disagree is more mainstream than ever.  It’s a cancer that’s metastasized throughout media, politics, and entertainment, rubber stamped by the liberal sentiment that calling oneself a feminist makes it so.  And conservative women aren’t the only targets.  Just ask Hillary Clinton, who discovered liberal-approved sexism firsthand during her campaign for the Democratic nomination.

Sexism, racism, and all the other -isms aren’t any more acceptable if you happen to dislike or disagree with the target.  This shouldn’t need to be said.  And it doesn’t matter if you’re a comedian or a liberal.  Sexism always matters.  And no political affiliation gives you license to hurl sexually inappropriate insults at women and girls without fear of consequences.

Palin

Autographed Letter Signed,

JENN Q. PUBLIC

*Jenn Q. Public  is  a frequent  ALS guest commentator. She describes herself as “a reluctant republican and recovered democrat who has struggled for years to reconcile my liberal upbringing with a reality that inspires right-of-center beliefs”.

Please visit her blog “Jenn Q. Public

About these ads
 

15 Responses to “David Letterman and the Culture of Liberal Entitlement by Jenn Q. Public”

  1. SYD Says:

    And excellent piece again, Afrocity.

    I need time to digest it… but you better believe it will be linked in my blog by tomorrow.

    Keep up the EXCELLENT work!

    SYD

  2. boldandbald Says:

    Jenn, another spot on post. It amazes me that so many of the comments that you quoted talk about how Palin played up her sexuality so she invited the criticism. I never saw her play up her sexuality. I saw her on stage with her family, holding her son, always looking very appropriate. The ‘wink’ during the VP debate had nothing to do with sexuality. What, exactly does the left think she should have done? Put on a burka? Or are attractive women just not allowed to run for office? If their sexually depraved minds can’t look at an attractive woman without imagining that she must want them otherwise she wouldn’t look so good, that is their problem, not hers.

    As for Letterman’s diatribe about how Sarah Palin looks like a flight attendant, waitress, nurse, etc., while I know he meant it as a put down, the fact is he is right. She does look like those women. And those women are America. And so is Sarah Palin. And that is the real reason that so many on the left hate her, because they hate America.

    • boldandbald:

      Thanks for reposting your comment on my blog. You liked that quote about the wink, huh? Isn’t it just appalling that there are actually people who pretend that a simple wink of the eye is some sort of come hither gesture?

      I agree that Sarah Palin has an American everywoman quality to her. Since we know how Letterman feels about Sarah Palin, his insults to flight attendants, waitresses, etc. were also insults to women in all those professions.

  3. TheRealKim Says:

    So all the pics of Obama shirtless are okay because he is a liberal?

    • boldandbald Says:

      The pictures of Obama shirtless were just wrong in so many ways. Ewww. :(

    • I agree with boldandbald that the pictures of Obama topless are all kinds of wrong. But IMO there is a qualitative difference in the intent of the people who spread those pictures of Obama around. Photos of Palin’s legs, for example, are meant to undermine her political career and credibility through objectification. Photos of Obama’s shirtless tend to be of the whole man, not just his pecs, and they are intended to boost our perception of him. They are the illustrations in the daily Obama hagiography produced by the American press. We are supposed to be left saying, “OMG, he’s sooooo dreamy,” not “How can we take a woman like that seriously?”

  4. Really it’s par for the course for liberals. Women are just one more class, and so are not individuals. Therefore treating them like trash is just the norm

  5. abepol Says:

    Let’s hope this is the end of the David Letterman – Sarah Palin feud. While last week Letterman apologized, it was in a snarky sort of way, and wasn’t accepted by Palin…
    Exclusive Video here:david letterman sarah palin joke

  6. Ario Says:

    Great article Afrocity. Ive noticed that some conservatives are now in the business of justifying racism, sexism and agism because the liberals are doing it. That infuriates me just as much as the Palin attacks. Last night, I was chatting on your chat link. Many of the people in that room are very nice(Granny…Rose), but a theme developed that became disturbing. A gop activist recently referred to Michelle Obama as a gorilla, which is of course racism and sexism at its worst. Several in the chat room tried very hard to justify the gorilla remarks and itwas disturbing. We should not be in the business of tolerating or tryin to justify hideous behavior just because liberals do it. Weshould not be in the businss of behaving like liberals. We must remember we are the party of Lincoln and Dr. King.

  7. johninca Says:

    Dr. King’s autobiography relates that it was the behavior of Richard Nixon (a CFR hack) and and John Kennedy in the 1960 campaign that finally drove African Americans to the Democrat side. This was a great tragedy because it allowed the Democratic party to live down its racist past. For those who aren’t familiar with that past, the web site for the National Black Republican Association has a lot of this information. It is run by Frances Rice, who knew the King family used to attend their church.

    • johninca Says:

      Apologies for the typo; I meant that Frances Rice knew the Kings and used to attend the church led by Dr. King Sr. in Atlanta, which I think was Ebeneezer Baptist.

  8. astra14 Says:

    Liberal vs conservative has to end, it’s not helping the country. Wrong is wrong! “Sexism, racism, and all the other -isms aren’t any more acceptable if you happen to dislike or disagree with the target.”

    There are plenty of liberals out there fighting hard to get Letterman fired, these liberals don’t agree with lunatic part of the liberal base that it’s okay to attack anyone based on philosophical beliefs. You just have to go to Hillbuzz and PumaPac to see they’re out there fighting FOR Sarah and all women.

    As an Independent who is liberal on some issues and conservative on others, and who admires Sarah Palin, I’ve spend the last several days since the incident writing to sponsors, CBS, and boycotting products.

    As Ario noted: “Ive noticed that some conservatives are now in the business of justifying racism, sexism and agism because the liberals are doing it.”

    Well the liberals are also taking notes from conservative playbooks in order to justify what they are doing. The two sides are starting to look some much like either other they may as well become one big political party.

    It’s time PEOPLE put aside LABELS because when something is WRONG, PEOPLE NEED TO WORK TOGETHER TO FIX IT! There are conservatives out to get Letterman fired, there are liberals out to get Letterman fired. The MSM will never admit both sides can work together to fix a problem – like the Tea Parties – because they can’t get it people CAN come together despite their differences. It’s up to EVERYONE to stand up for what’s right and stop laying blame due to ideological differences because there are good and bad among both groups.

  9. Janis Says:

    You know, I remember the old accusations of feminism only being for fat, ugly women who can’t get laid. I remember being infuriated by them, because — as is quite evident — being pretty, thin, and f*ckable sure hasn’t helped Palin’s career. It seems to make her even more appealing as a vicious target for attacks. There’s nothing a liberal male likes better than to let some hot chick have what’s coming to her.

    But feminism evidently agrees that feminism is only for fat, ugly women who can’t get laid. I’ve had it with trying to be BFFs with women like that. They hate me for what I look like, and I’m not one of them. Fine.

    I have just given up on women completely. The reason we haven’t had power for a million years is because we don’t deserve it. We can blame men all we want, and they sure are assh*les most times, but the truth is that we have no power because the minute some power by mistake falls into our laps, we stagger around cow-eyed looking for someone else to hand it to. I mean come on — all other human being who have been in a powerless situation have fought and been recognized — except for US? Across the board? For a MILLION YEARS? And it’s SOMEONE ELSE’S FAULT?!

    Just SHUT UP, ladies. Pick up the power or STFU. I’ve had it with feminist whining. Either pick up the power and stop putting any non-female head of yourself, or shut up and stay in the back of the bus.

    Seriously. we put everyone else ahead of ourselves, and then whine and moan about how we end up in last place all the time. No shit.

  10. valorie Says:

    Janis knows what’s up!!! Wow, this is the best stuff I have read on this subject in a really long time. Very thought provoking.


Comments are closed.

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers